<< Back to BIEN 435 Course Rules
Measurement of
Pressure Drop across a Stenosis
Null Hypothesis
This
experiment models the pressure drop across a stenosis in an artery. You will test two null hypotheses:
Theory for Pressure Drops Across a Stenosis
Young (1979) summarized the results
of a number of studies on arterial stenoses with an equation for pressure loss
() that is recast here in terms of flow rate () instead of Reynolds number:
Eq. (1)
where is dynamic viscosity, is fluid density, Dv
is diameter of the vein, Ds
is stenosis diameter at its narrowest point, and is the turbulent loss
coefficient (1.52). The expression in square brackets is called the laminar
loss coefficient, and the expression within in angled brackets is the effective
stenosis length. Physically, the first term represents losses caused by
separation and turbulence, where as the second term represents viscous (or
laminar) losses. As a consequence, the
dynamic viscosity appears only in the second term.
For the
laboratory you will be doing, the following values or ranges of parameters are
appropriate:
for 50% diameter
reduction
will range from 2 ml/s
to 20 ml/s
will be 1 to 2 cm
Before You Come to the Laboratory
You should
have some understanding of the behavior of pressure as a function of stenosis
diameter. Use Excel to plot pressure
drop as a function of flow rate for a few typical cases. Use the typical parameter values given
above. Plot 3 curves on the same plot,
one for a 25% diameter reduction, one for a 50% diameter reduction, and one for
a 66% diameter reduction.
Set up the
formulas in Excel to do the following:
If this is
set up properly, you can obtain the expected pressure drop immediately whenever
you take a flow rate measurement. This pressure
can then be immediately compared to the pressure drop you obtained from the
pressure transducer to see if there is an obvious error in either your
procedure or your calculations.
Experimental Setup
You will
need the following materials for this experiment:
You will need the following:
The experimental setup is as shown
in Figure 1.
You will
need to set up this flow configuration. with the materials provided. Note that the pressure transducer has two
fluid inlets to it. However, it is not a
differential transducer and only senses the static pressure that is applied to
its sensing element. Connect the
transducer to one of the pressure taps at a time. The other inlet is used to bleed air out of
the transducer after each connection is made.
If you wish, you can physically connect the transducer to both of the
pressure taps and use the stopcocks to control which of the taps is open to the
transducer. However, if you do this, make sure that one tap is open to the
transducer and the other is closed to the transducer when you make your
measurement.
Transducer Calibration
Calibrate
the pressure transducer using the weight of water as a standard. The pressure at the transducer is rgh, where r is the density of water, g is the acceleration of gravity, and h is the height of the fluid surface
above the pressure transducer. For
example, if the transducer height changes by 5 cm, the pressure changes by
.
Take
several readings of voltage from the signal conditioner as a function of the
height of the reservoir surface above the transducer. Vary this height by changing the position of
the transducer, rather than the position of the reservoir.
To obtain
the calibration, perform a linear least squares fit of pressure as a function
of voltage (V). This will enable you to
translate all of the voltage readings directly to pressure from the slope m.
That is, .
You will
need to know the true diameter of the tubing used in this experiment. This may not be the same as what is written
on the tubing. Fill a length of the
tubing with water, and use the volume of water required to fill the tubing to
calculate back to tubing diameter ().
Preliminaries
You will
need two pressure taps, one upstream and one downstream of the stenosis.
Insert the
first stenosis in the tubing. The
easiest way to do this is to cut the tubing at the location where you wish to
place the stenosis. The stenosis is then
inserted halfway into one side and halfway into the other so that the stenosis
itself holds the two pieces of tubing together (Figure 2).
Connect the
pressure transducer to the upstream pressure tap. Make sure that there are no air bubbles in
the line.
Flow Rate
Calculate
the flow rate that is required to obtain a cross-sectional average velocity of
50 cm/sec (). Use a graduated
cylinder to set the flow rate to approximately this value. Measure the flow rate as precisely as
possible. You will need to measure the
pressure when the flow is off and when the flow is on. The difference between these two is the
pressure drop caused by fluid flow.
The flow
rate will change somewhat as a result of changes in the height of the fluid in
the reservoir. Be sure to maintain this
height constant as much as possible.
Also, determine how much a given change in height changes the flow
rate. To do this, take repeated flow
rate measurements as the fluid reservoir height decreases.
Now connect
the pressure transducer to the downstream pressure tap. Again, measure pressure with the flow on and
the flow off. The pressure with the flow
off should be the same as the no-flow measurement upstream, but may not be as a
result of transducer drift. This should
not be a large problem as long as the flow-on and flow-off measurements are
taken close enough to one another in time.
Repeat
these measurements five times.
Reduce the
flow rate by a factor of 2, and repeat the set of 5 measurements again. In the end you should have enough data to
fill Table 1.
|
For Flow Rate |
For Pressure Drops |
|||||
Conditions |
Volume (ml) |
Time (sec) |
Voltage Up-stream No Flow |
Voltage Up-stream With Flow |
Voltage Down-stream No Flow |
Voltage Down-stream With Flow |
|
50% Short Stenosis |
Flow Rate 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Flow Rate 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
50% Long Stenosis |
Flow Rate 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Flow Rate 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recalibration
To ensure
that your calibration has not changed, perform a post-experiment calibration,
again using the weight of water as your standard.
Data analysis
1. Plot the measurements of output
voltage as a function of pressure for the transducer calibration. Perform a least square fit of pressure as a
function of voltage. The slope is the
transducer sensitivity, in volts/(dynes/cm2). Show the raw data for the calibration on a
plot as individual points without connecting lines. Show the least square fit model as a solid
line. If the pre-experiment and
post-experiment calibrations are significantly different, perform least squares
fits for these data sets separately.
2. For each data set value of (Volume
Collected, Time of Collection), translate to flow rate (Q).
3. For each data value of (Change in
voltage upstream, Change in voltage downstream), translate to pressure drop.
4. Plot Pressure as a function of Q
(use symbols for these data).
5. Plot Young’s equation for the same
flow rate range (use a solid line for these data).
6. Discuss reasons for any differences
(theory vs experiment).
7. Perform Student’s T-tests to test
the two hypotheses. The first T-test
will compare data taken with different flow rates but the same stenosis. The second T-test will compare the two
stenoses of different lengths. Provide a
p-value in both cases. Are the results
significant.
8. As part of your discussion,
determine whether the overall pressure drop in the system () is accounted for by the pressure drop across the stenosis
and the Poiseuille flow pressure drop in the tube. Do you expect the measured flow rate to be
higher or lower than what would be predicted by the combination of Young’s equation
and Poiseuille’s equation?
References
Young DF:
Fluid mechanics of arterial stenosis. J Biomech Eng 101: 157-175, 1979
Biomedical Engineering
Senior Laboratory (BIEN 435)
Steven A. Jones